Saturday, April 21, 2012

The Underlying Current


By Pamela J. Wells


There is an underlying current—underneath all of the anger, frustration, bitterness, hate, and violence—this current is what is churning within us, our desires, passions, superficialities, the sense of lack and the need for more—more material objects, more money, more fame, more fortune, more recognition, more stuff to attempt to fill that void that is within us.

Pick up an object right now. It can be anything, a vase, a chair—anything. Now, if you had more of that object, would you feel better? Maybe, if they were in different colors? If you had 10, 20, 50, 100, a 1000 of them—do you think you would feel better? No, you wouldn’t. You would have numerous amounts of them, but you would still feel the same way about yourself as you did when you had just one or even none of them.

Our society has to change—from a selfish, self-centered one, to a compassionate and giving one, starting with our families and the way we treat one another. The majority of our society, especially in the West, lives from the ego (the false idea of oneself) instead of from the heart, where celebrity, status, and wealth are cherished and sought after. People cannot live joyful and peaceful lives with themselves, with others, with their families, nor can humanity come together, united as one global family, when they are constantly competing with each other.

I do not see much change happening in the world as far as lessening the focus off of our egos, and becoming more selfless, more compassionate; however, it is possible to turn this world around, but it starts with each individual, starting with our families, being present and selfless in all of our actions and interactions with others.

If you do not think that ego is a problem, then you choose pain and suffering over peace. You are a part of the unconscious majority that chooses to cling to living a separate life a part from the rest of the world. When you choose to remain in the egoic state of consciousness, of what's in it for me, of competition, power, and wealth, status and recognition—when you idolize celebrities, would rather hoard than give, and when you choose to turn a blind eye to children and families who are—still, to this day, senselessly starving to death in Africa—this is the result, the outcome, of where our consciousness is at, the underlying current, that results in children and families starving to death.

Here is another example of the aftereffects of the underlying current: I have never seen pictures of children who were physically abused until I visited Petro Neagu’s blog today. It was the most horrific thing I have ever seen! Most of them, were babies and toddlers. It appeared that one of the children had passed on. She was under a sheet, lying on the floor with a pillow under her head, as though she was sleeping, but in shades of blue. It is deeply saddening and disturbing to see such extreme physical violence against children. If you want to become actively involved in helping to prevent child abuse or if you think your life is hard and you find yourself complaining about how nothing ever goes right for you, nothing ever good happens in your life, visit her website and read this article:


In order to wake-up and come to the understanding of what we need to do to turn this world around, all we have to do is watch our kids. What our kids care about, tells us what we care about. If all they care about are celebrities and becoming famous, then we’re in trouble, on a personal level and a societal level. It is our responsibility to teach our children life lessons that will, not only, be beneficial for them as they are growing up into adults, but that will also benefit our society as well—everyone that they come into contact with. One of the main ways children can learn to be more compassionate is to actively do volunteer work, taking the focus off of themselves and helping others in need. Otherwise, they are just sitting around playing their video games, gossiping online, or watching movies and—guess what, they grow up to be adults just like you and me, and when they don’t get what they want, they lash out at others, verbally and many times through physical violence.

Our society has to change, from an always getting mentality to an always giving mentality. Otherwise, we not only contribute to our own pain and suffering, but we also contribute to the pain and suffering of humanity. As long as people continue to remain passionate about all things superficial, nothing is ever going to change. The level of consciousness of this planet will never rise any higher than it is and we will continue to remain stuck in this egoic state of consciousness of endless amounts of pain and suffering.

When you see violence on TV, or on the internet, or you hear about it from someone, you can’t just think, “They need to be put away, to be brought to justice,” because, it’s not just their problem, it’s our problem. It’s the underlying current of faulty and false ideas, notions, and perceptions about ourselves and others, our clinging to material objects, greed and selfishness, that drives this kind of behavior. When there is inequality and greed, people suffer, families suffer. They suffer from poverty, starvation, and homelessness. It’s that underlying current that bubbles up to the surface. Until the current changes and we start to live consciously—egoless—selfless lives, where humanity is more important than ourselves, the issue of violence and unrest will continue to rage on.

Jiddu Krishnamurti said it best, “It is no measure of health to be well adjusted to a profoundly sick society.”

So, we have to wake-up from the dream of illusion and delusion, the societal illness, the norm, to see reality and what no longer serves us, humanity, living beings, the earth—but, to wake-up from it, you have to see it, a light bulb has to go off in your head. You have to be sick and tired of the way it is, the way your life is, the way life is, the way humanity is. When you’ve had enough of pain and suffering and cannot continue on any longer, that is when you are given the opportunity to wake-up.

You either wake-up or check out. And sometimes, you need to check out, temporarily, to wake-up, because you are surely not going to do it if you continue to go to work, play, and hangout at the fishing hole of delusion, where you will find the majority.

I see and hear people complaining all of the time about the system, the government, the corporations, Wall Street; however, these same people are still actively shopping and buying the products and services of these corporations. We have the power. The consumer has the power. If it wasn’t for us, those greedy corporations would not be where they are today. They would not be lobbying the government, because they would have no money. We have to wake-up. Even while most of us have had enough, we are still ignorant to what we are doing to ourselves. Instead of blaming, we have to be accountable for the choices that we make. This is not to say stop buying merchandise—no—research the corporations that make the product and offer the services and the financial institutions that you are investing your money in, first. If they are destroying the environment on a major scale, if they are involved in child labor, if they are creating more unemployment, so that people end up homeless, etc. don’t buy their products or services anymore. It’s simple. Even better, buy your products from small, mom and pop businesses, as opposed to the major corporations, which own most of the products you see on the shelves.

If you want change, you have to open your eyes and see what the real problem is and quit looking at the surface level of appearances. You have to dive deep and take action that lessens the problem and does not contribute to the problem.

If We Really Want Change,
We Have to Wake-Up to Reality,
But, Not Just Wake-Up,
We Have To Take Action.
The Violence Is Not The Focus.
The Underlying Current Is.


Copyright © 2012 Pamela J. Wells. All Rights Reserved
Image licensed under Bigstockphoto.com

Feel free to add a comment, if there is anything that you would like to add or any experiences that you would care to share.

Message To Humanity ~Kali Baaba



"There is no duality. In other words, there's no this way completely opposite and separate from that way. When you say duality, you say separation. No human being and no religion and no dharma is separate from another. They're different facets, different aspects. They are like grains of sand, but each grain of sand is different, but together they make the beach, and the beach serves the ocean and is served by the ocean; so, we must remember that there is no separation."

~Kali Baaba

Order: What Is Order In Freedom?

As one observes all over the world, there is such extraordinary disorder.

Jiddu Krishnamurti Conversation with Dr. Allan W. Anderson San Diego, California 1974

Krishnamurti: The East, especially in India, they said measurement is an illusion, to find the immeasurable the measurement must come to an end. Reality is immeasurable. The measurement can never find, a mind that is measuring, a mind that is caught in measurement cannot find truth.

Krishnamurti begins discussing duality (for example: good/bad, right/wrong, poor/rich, smart/stupid), this as opposed to that, measurement, comparison, division, separation, disorder, and the fragmentation of thought starting at 0:17:00 of the video.


Excerpt from the video:

A Wholly Different Way of Living - Excerpt

J. Krishnamurti - Fifth Dialogue with Dr Allan W. Anderson in San Diego, California, February 1974

K: Can one educate a student to live a life of non comparison - bigger car, lesser car, you follow?

A: Yes.

K: Dull, you are clever, I am not clever. What happens if I don't compare at all? Will I become dull?

A: On the contrary.

K: I'm only dull, I know I'm dull only through comparison. If I don't compare, I don't know what I am. Then I begin from there.

A: Yes, yes. The world becomes infinitely accessible.

K: Oh, then the whole thing becomes extraordinarily different. There is no competition, there is no anxiety, there is no conflict with each other.

A: This is why you use the word total often, isn't it?

K: Yes.

A: In order to express that there's nothing drawn out from one condition to the other. There is no link there, there is no bridge there. Totally disordered. Totally order.

K: Absolutely.

A: Yes, and you use the word 'absolute' often, which terrifies many people today.

K: Sir, after all mathematics is order. The highest form of mathematical investigation, you must have a mind that is totally orderly.

A: The marvellous thing about maths too, is that whereas it's the study of quantity, you don't make passage from one integer to another by two getting larger. Two stops at two. Two and a half is no more two. Somehow that's the case.

K: Yes.

A: But a child when he is taught mathematics is never introduced to that - that I've ever heard of.

K: You see, sir, our teaching, our everything is so absurd. Is it possible, sir, to observe this movement of disorder, with a mind that is disorderly itself, and say, can this mind observe disorder, this mind which is already in a state of disorder. So disorder isn't out there but in here. Now can the mind observe that disorder without introducing a factor of an observer who is orderly?

A: Who will superimpose.

K: Yes. Therefore observe, perceive disorder without the perceiver. I don't know if I am making sense at all.

A: Yes, yes you are, yes you are making sense.

K: That is, sir, to understand disorder we think an orderly mind is necessary.

A: As over against the disorderly mind.

K: Disorderly mind. But the mind itself has created this disorder, which is thought and all the rest of it. So can the mind not look at disorder out there, but at the maker of disorder which is in here?

A: Which is itself the very mind as disorder.

K: Mind itself is disordered.

A: Yes. But as soon as that is stated conceptually...

K: No, no. Concepts are finished.

A: Yes. But we are using words.

K: We are using words to communicate.

A: Exactly. What I'm concerned with, just for a second, is what are we going to say when we hear the statement that it is the disordered mind that keeps proliferating disorder, but it is that disordered mind that must see, it must see.

K: I'm going to show you, you will see in a minute what takes place. Disorder is not outside of me, disorder is inside of me. That's a fact. Because the mind is disorderly all its activities must be disorderly. And the activities of disorder is proliferating or is moving in the world. Now can this mind observe itself without introducing the factor of an orderly mind, which is the opposite?

A: Yes it is. Of course it is the opposite.

K: So can it observe without the observer who is the opposite?

A: That's the question.

K: Now watch it, sir, if you are really interested in it.

A: I am. I am deeply interested in it.

K: If you will see. The observer is the observed. The observer who says, I am orderly, and I must put order in disorder. That is generally what takes place. But the observer is the factor of disorder. Because the observer is the past, is the factor of division. Where there is division there is not only conflict but disorder. You can see, sir, it is happening actually in the world. I mean all this problem of energy, all this problem of law, peace, and all the rest, can be solved absolutely when there are not separate governments, sovereign armies, and say, look let's solve this problem all together, for god's sake. We are human beings. This earth is meant for us to live on - not Arabs and Israelis, and America and Russia - it is our earth.

A: And it's round.

K: But we will never do this because our minds are so conditioned to live in disorder, to live in conflict.

A: And vocation is given a religious description in terms of the task of cleaning up the disorder with my idea of order.

K: Your idea of order is the fact that has produced disorder.

A: Exactly.

K: So, it brings up a question, sir, which is very interesting: can the mind observe itself without the observer? Because the observer is the observed. The observer who says, 'I will bring order in disorder', that observer itself is a fragment of disorder, therefore it can never bring about order. So can the mind be aware of itself as a movement of disorder, not trying to correct it, not trying to justify it, not trying to shape it, just to observe? I said previously to observe, sitting on the banks of a river and watch the waters go by. You see, then you see much more. But if you are in the middle of it swimming you will see nothing.

A: I've never forgotten that it was when I stopped questioning, when I stood before that droplet of dew on the leaf, that everything changed totally, totally. And what you say is true. Once something like that happens there isn't a regression from it.

K: Sir, it is not once, it is...

A: ...forever. Yes.

K: It's not an incident that took place. My life is not an incident, it is a movement.

A: Exactly.

K: And in that movement I observe this movement of disorder. And therefore the mind itself is disorderly and how can that disorderly, chaotic, contradictory, absurd little mind bring about order? It can't. Therefore a new factor is necessary. And the new factor is to observe, to perceive, to see without the perceiver.

A: To perceive without the perceiver. To perceive without the perceiver.

K: Because the perceiver is the perceived.

A: Yes.

K: If you once grasp that then you see everything without the perceiver. You don't bring in your personality, your ego, your selfishness. You say, 'Disorder is the factor which is in me, not out there'. The politicians are trying to bring about order when they are themselves so corrupt. You follow, sir? How can they bring order?

A: It's impossible. It's impossible. It's one long series of...

K: That's what's happening in the world. The politicians are ruling the world - from Moscow, from New Delhi, from Washington, wherever it is - it's the same pattern being repeated. Living a chaotic, corrupt life, you try to bring order in the world. It's childish. So that's why transformation of the mind is not your mind or my mind, it's the mind, the human mind.

A: Or the mind trying to order itself, even. Not even that.

K: Now how can it, it is like a blind man trying to bring about colour. And he says, well that's grey. It has no meaning. So can the mind observe this disorder in itself without the observer who has created disorder? Sir, this brings up a very simple thing. To look at a tree, at a woman, at a mountain, at a bird, or a sheet of water with the light on it, the beauty of it, to look without the see-er. Because the moment the see-er comes in, the observer comes in, he divides. And division is all right as long as it's descriptive. But when you are living, living, that division is destructive. I don't know if you know what I mean...

What is the Meaning of Life After Death & Enlightenment in Buddhism?

~Pomnyun Sunim Dharma Talk